
I once sat in on an art history class taught by multicultural theorist Thomas McEvilley, wherein he lectured on yoga. He explained that what we as Westerners knew of the practice was really a very simplified overview of the true nature of yoga. McEvilley explained that historically, yoga involved extremely complex beliefs and rituals, and he gave an example involving, to paraphrase, a man and woman mixing various bodily fluids together on the ground and then licking the mix off each others’ open palms. And I’ve yet to witness any of NYC’s yoga diehards attempting that pose. Learning this made me newly intrigued by yoga, and also with artistic forms that possess an Eastern religion-based history.
Currently, Rubin Museum in New York has on view Tradition Transformed: Tibetan Artists Respond, the first-ever exhibition of contemporary Tibetan art in New York. Many of the nine artists included were either personally affected by the Tibetan diaspora, or are the children of parents who were forced to leave Tibet following the 1959 uprising. Their works highlight the tension between traditional Tibetan practices and newer, Western inspirations (many of the pieces shown seem heavily influenced by Andy Warhol). One artist, Kesang Lamdark, who grew up in Switzerland and received his MFA from Columbia University, plays with this Warhol influence in a humorous way that highlights the ubiquity of Warhol’s favorite muse: the can. In many of his pieces in the show, he has taken tantric imagery and repositioned it, via tiny pointillist pinholes, onto the bottoms of soda cans. Look through the cans, and a small, complicated and enchanting image appears.
Much of the contemporary Tibetan art shown seems linked to a strong-held devotion to Tibetan Buddhism and traditional Tibetan art-making practices, yet most also seems to be entranced by Western aesthetics. The dissolution of traditional Tibetan culture, via the diaspora, can be seen as the main inspiration for the forward momemtum of contemporary Tibetan art–“Without the Tibetan diaspora I would be in Tibet herding yaks or being a monk,” says Lamdark. But is hard for a Western art writer to position a forced cultural reconfiguration as entirely positive. There is something captivating about a singular belief system, unadulterated by Western tendencies toward skepticism. “In old Tibet, art had no individuality,” says Lamdark, to counterpoint this, yet in the contemporary West, we seem to have such a hard time truly believing in anything: love, friendships, ourselves. Entirely different from a culture of traditional Tibetan Buddhism, which holds a belief system indivisible from personal identity, our beliefs lean more and more toward rote social expectations. Probably because it’s just too hard to believe in a world that doesn’t really believe in itself.
Tradition Transformed will be on view until October 18
Rubin Museum
150 West 17th Street, NYC










